Centeno v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, without costs, on the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division (48 AD2d 812).
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Cooke. Judge Fuchsberg dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: I would re*933verse on the well-written dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice Emilio Nunez at the Appellate Division, emphasizing that the fact that a departure from accepted medical practice occurs in a psychiatric rather than in a nonpsychiatric setting is only an element to be weighed along with all the other circumstances in a particular case…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Centeno v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
3Cited by26 opinions
- Littleton v. Good Samaritan Hospital & Health CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Schrempf v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Topel v. Long Island Jewish Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bell v. New York City Health & Hospital Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Paddock v. ChackoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.