Legal Opinion

Centeno v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1976PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, without costs, on the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division (48 AD2d 812).

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Cooke. Judge Fuchsberg dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: I would re*933verse on the well-written dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice Emilio Nunez at the Appellate Division, emphasizing that the fact that a departure from accepted medical practice occurs in a psychiatric rather than in a nonpsychiatric setting is only an element to be weighed along with all the other circumstances in a particular case…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Centeno v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Littleton v. Good Samaritan Hospital & Health CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Schrempf v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Topel v. Long Island Jewish Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Bell v. New York City Health & Hospital Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Paddock v. ChackoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API