Legal Opinion

McLerkin v. Schilling

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 6, 1936No. 4-4359PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.

Appellant is the Avidoxv of the late W. B. McLerkin who, at the time of his death intestate in December, 1934, was engaged in the automobile business as a partner with the appellee, Arthur Schilling, under the firm name of Paragould Motor Service Company. He left no personal property except his one-half interest in said partnership assets, which partnership indebtedness exceeded its assets. Appellant filed her claim in the probate court for the statutory allowance of $300 in her favor under § 80, Crawford & Moses’ Digest. Her claim was disallowed in said court and again disallowed in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Adler, Goldman & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  2. Coolidge v. BurkeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
  3. Evans v. HoytSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. Hill v. DraperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  5. Marlatt v. Scantland ad.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1858

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. Van EchauteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Sutton v. McClainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  3. Hogan v. HoganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  4. Waldo v. RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Sutton v. McClainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API