Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Muser

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 15, 1923Published

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

The petitioner, the Hurley Machine Company, in this proceeding seeks to have two claims adjudicated against the estate.(1) By a decree of this court, affirmed by the Appellate Division, the Hurley Machine Company has established its right to an interest in certain patents owned in his lifetime by the decedent. The amount due under that decree has been fixed by stipulation of the parties at the sum of $10,705.03. The first question involves the right of the estate to set off against this amount a claim for royalties alleged to be due from the Hurley Machine Company. Muser was the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marston v. . SwettNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Dunn v. . SteubingNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Marston v. . SwettNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. In Re the Accounting of ZieglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Hyatt v. . IngallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API