Legal Opinion

Hooksett Conservation Commission v. Hooksett Zoning Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 23, 2003No. 2001-370PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.

The defendant, Hooksett Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) and the intervenor, Sered Memorial, LLC (Sered), appeal an order of the Superior Court (McGuire, J.) denying their motion to dismiss. They argue that the superior court erred in ruling that the plaintiff, the Hooksett Conservation Commission (commission), has standing to appeal a decision of the ZBA to the superior court pursuant to RSA 677:4 (1996 & Supp. 2000) (amended 2000). We reverse.

On July 28, 2000, the commission reviewed an application for site plan approval submitted by Sered to the Hooksett Planning Board (planning board) for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Silva v. BotschSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Snow v. American Morgan Horse Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  3. Planning Board of Marshfield v. Zoning Board of Appeals of PembrokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. K & J Associates v. City of LebanonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  5. Crowley v. FrazierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HoweCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  2. Thomas v. Town of HooksettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  3. Goldstein v. Town of BedfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. McDonald v. Town of Effingham Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API