Legal Opinion · Dissent

J.S.A. v. M.H.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 11, 2008No. Nos. 3—04—0678, 3—04—0908, 3—05—0556, 3—05—0561 consPublished

1DissentJustice Schmidt

I

As explained below, I believe that J.S.A. was wrongly decided by the supreme court. That being said, we in the appellate court are still bound by it. Inexplicably, the majority reverses the trial court on the basis that the trial court did exactly what the supreme court told it to do. The supreme court made it clear that, “As stated, the Parentage Act specifically provides in section 14(a)(1) that decisions regarding the involvement of the biological father in the life of the child are to be governed solely by what is in the child’s best interests.” J.S.A. v. M.H., 224 Ill. 2d 182, 211, 863…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caveney v. BowerIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. J.S.A. v. M.H.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Jsa v. MhIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People Ex Rel. Blackmon v. BrentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  5. J.S.A. v. M.H.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API