Legal Opinion

Rush v. Brown

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1941No. 34,984PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action by a farm laborer to recover damages from his employer for personal injuries sustained while he and defendant were operating a cultivator, more particularly designated as a disk tiller, drawn by a tractor. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

The first complaint is, defendant’s general demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence should have been sustained. The evidence of plaintiff was in substance as follows: The disk tiller was new to plaintiff (the record refers to it both as a “one-way” and as a “disk…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hill v. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Robinson v. ShortSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Hogan v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Hayes v. ReidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HolmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  2. Blackmore v. AuerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Roddy v. Hill Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Schoof v. ByrdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. Harvey v. PalmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API