Legal Opinion
Martin v. Jablonski
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 15, 1925PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The plaintiff seeks to restrain the defendant from engaging in competing business. It is alleged in the bill that the plaintiff and defendant were copartners in the retail clothing business in Webster; that the defendant sold to the plaintiff by a contract in writing his interest in the copartnership including its good will; that the plaintiff has since conducted the business on his sole account, and that there has been violation of the terms and implications of that written contract by the defendant by engaging in a competing business. The defendant in his answer set up amongst other matters…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Glover v. Waltham Laundry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Stoops v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Sherman v. PfefferkornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Hoxie v. ChaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Dzuris v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Groman v. Watman (In Re Watman)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Kennedy Bros. v. BirdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Graustein v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Club Aluminum Co. v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Stevens v. William S. Howe Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.