Legal Opinion

In Re Morris Plan Co. of Iowa

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided April 13, 1989No. 15-00537PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Re:

Request for Fee Enhancement

MICHAEL J. MELLOY, Chief Judge.

The matter before the Court is a Request for Fee Enhancement filed by counsel for Debtors, Dixon & Dixon, P.C. (Dixon & Dixon). Dixon & Dixon requests a fee enhancement of $25,000 in each of the above captioned cases, based on the “exceptional results” obtained in each case. The request is opposed by the Unsecured Creditor’s Committee in each case.

The following constitutes the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order as required by Fed.R.Bankr.Proc. 7052.

BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS OF FACT

MorAmerica Financial…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Mirant Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
  2. In Re FarahUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1992
  3. In Re D.W.G.K. RestaurantsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1989
  4. In Re First American Health Care of Georgia, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 1997
  5. In Re Nucentrix Broadband Networks, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API