Legal Opinion

Barkley v. Corrections Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 22, 1992No. 87-0346C; CA A64332PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment in this negligence action. The issue is whether the sexual assault of plaintiff, a convenience store cashier, resulted in an injury for which she would have been entitled to benefits under the workers’ compensation laws and for which defendants are therefore immune under the Oregon Tort Claims Act. ORS 30.265(3)(a).

In 1981, Hair began serving time in the Oregon State Correctional Institution (OSCI) for first degree sodomy and first degree sexual abuse. Those convictions arose out of an incident in which he assaulted a convenience store clerk. In 1984,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Phil A. Livesley Co. v. RussOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Holthaus v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Jesse v. Savings ProductsTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Matter of RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Thornton v. HamlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stone v. FinnertyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. K-MART v. EvensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. McLeod v. Tecorp International, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Redman Industries, Inc. v. LangCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Wagner v. JELD WEN, INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API