Holthaus v. Industrial Commission
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kasserman
Petitioner, Judith Ann Holthaus, filed an application for adjustment of her claim under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 48, par. 138.1 et seq.) for gunshot injuries suffered while she was employed by the respondent City of Pana (Pana). An arbitrator, denying benefits, found that Holthaus had not proved that her injuries arose out of and in the course of her employment. In a split decision, the Industrial Commission confirmed the decision of the arbitrator and adopted the arbitrator’s findings as the findings of the Commission. One commissioner filed a written dissent.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Certi-Serve, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Castaneda v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Campbell "66" Express, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Allied Manufacturing, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brady v. Louis Ruffolo & Sons Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- County of Cook v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Barkley v. Corrections DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.