Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Sheridan v. French

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Daniels, J.:

Tbe relator was a member of the police force of tbe city of New York, from October 1872, to the 10th of February, 1877. His salary was fixed by law at the sum of $1,200 a year. This was *618from time to time paid to him, with the exception of certain sums deducted on account of his absence from duty while he was disabled, sick, lame and infirm. „ These sums are stated to have amounted in the aggregate to about $500. And it was to obligate the respondent^, as the board of police of the city, to pay these deductions or provide for their payment, that the application was made for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Acker v. . AckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. In the Matter of Manhattan Savings Inst'n.New York Court of Appeals · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Best v. PrestonNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  2. In re Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. People ex rel. Ehrlich v. GrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. People ex rel. Nelson v. MarshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API