People ex rel. Best v. Preston
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Albany county. Affirmed. Api liuation fur a peremptory mandamus on the relation of William J. Best against. Charles M. Preston, superintendent of the hanking department ■of the- slate of New York. From an order denying the mandamus relator appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLearned, P. J.
This is an appeal from an order denying relator’s motion for a writ of peremptory mandamus. In 1877 the relator was appointed Lite hanking department a special examiner to examine the Union Dime Savings Bank of New York. He entered on his work September 26th, and continued till February 27, 1878. The statute says that the expense “shall be paid by tlie corporation examined, in such amount as the superintendent shall ■certify to he just and reasonable.” Laws 1875, c. 371, § 43. During the ■examination the bank paid for this examination, for services, expenses, services of accountant,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Bank of the MetropolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Osterhoudt v. . RigneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- The People Ex Rel. Millard v. . ChapinNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- People ex rel. Sheridan v. FrenchNew York Supreme Court · 1884
- Lavalette v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1864
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Gamble v. GambleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Warner v. Buffalo Drydock Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Cain v. Union Central Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- State ex rel. Weiss v. KeeferOhio Court of Appeals · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.