Legal Opinion
Tumarkin v. Goldstein
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 17, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
33 N.J. Super. 46 (1954)
109 A.2d 435
ALLAN L. TUMARKIN, AS ASSIGNEE FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS OF EDAN SHOPS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
MORTON GOLDSTEIN, ROBERT GOLDSTEIN AND JOHN BERTONE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 8, 1954.
Decided November 17, 1954.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and SCHETTINO.
Mr. Allan L. Tumarkin argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant.
Mr. Louis Gluck argued the cause for the defendants-respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, S.J.A.D.
On July 12, 1950 Edan Shops, Inc., entered into…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilentz v. HendricksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
- Savarese v. Pyrene Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Wilentz v. HendricksonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Ristan v. FrantzenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- The Coast National Bank v. BloomSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Navarro v. George Koch & Sons, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Borbely v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- Seaview Orthopaedics on Assignment from Fleming v. National Healthcare Resources, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Mahoney v. Nitroform Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Massey v. Del-Valley Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.