Legal Opinion

Hoage v. Murch Bros. Const. Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 1, 1931No. 5010PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRONER, Associate Justice.

On December 3, 1928, Turner Sutton, a resident of the District of Columbia, while employed as a laborer by Mureh Bros. Construction Company, one of appellees, received injuries from which he died. Thereafter a claim for compensation under the District of Columbia Workmen’s Compensation Act was filed with the Compensation Commission by Sadie Turner Sutton, as his surviving common-law wife. A hearing was had; the injury, death, and notice were admitted, as well as the relationship of employer and employee and that the services then being performed by deceased were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meister v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Travers v. ReinhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Offield v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  4. Wheeling Corrugating Co. v. McManigalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  5. Denison v. DenisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Alphonso Marcus v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U. S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. Queen v. QueenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Robinson v. EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Thomas v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  5. Coates v. WattsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API