Sufrin v. Arbeau, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
From the obfuscating mass of irrelevancies, statements, repetitions, arguments and conclusions presented in these voluminous papers, I have gleaned the following material facts:
The defendant Arbeau, Inc., the corporate alter ego of the individual defendants, was the owner of certain residential real estate in Manhattan. (The other defendants are not interested in the present motions and are not hereinafter referred to.) It was duly mortgaged to the plaintiff’s assignor. Default ensued. The defendants claim that the value of the property is $200,000. The amount of the mortgage indebtedness,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hale v. . ClausonNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Mullins v. FranzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Fried v. Lakeland Hide & Leather Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Woolf v. Leicester Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Forest Hill Cemetery Ass'n v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re LacailleNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Hummel v. HummelNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Sorin v. Shahmoon Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Keller v. Quad Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Grace v. Real Property Owners, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.