Legal Opinion

Wuerthner v. Workingmen's Benevolent Society

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Assumpsit by Carl F. Wuerthner against the Workingmen’s Benevolent Society to recover sick benefits. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff was a member of a local benevolent society, and made a claim for sick benefits amounting to $78, claiming to have been entitled to them for a period of 26 weeks, during which time, his declaration alleges, he was sick and unable to work, on account of nervous trouble. The case was submitted to a jury, and a verdict in favor of the defendant was rendered. The plaintiff has appealed.

The evidence showed that the society placed his claim in the hands of a committee, according to its custom, and a report to disallow the claim was adopted. Subsequently the plaintiff was expelled from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bachmann v. New Yorker Deutcher Arbiter BundNew York Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lowe v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 705Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. BarnhillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Golden Star Lodge No. 1 v. WattersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API