Legal Opinion
Miszko v. Gress
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*230OPINION OF THE COURT
Thomas J. Spargo, J.
This action seeks recovery for personal injuries and damages suffered by plaintiffs Michael and Susan Miszko (Miszkos) due to defendants’ negligent operation of an automobile. The defendants, through their insurance company (Prudential), have offered to pay the entire amount of available liability insurance, $25,000, to the Miszkos in settlement of the action. The Miszkos have refused to endorse the settlement draft tendered by Prudential because the New York State Insurance Fund (State Fund) claims that the entire settlement proceeds, less attorney’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Pinto v. AnconaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Buckley v. National Freight, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Stiffen v. CNA InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Champagne v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miszko v. GressAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004