Champagne v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company is required to defend and indemnify the defendant John L. Ho-man, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, Jr., J.), dated July 30, 1990, which denied her motion for summary judgment and granted the defendants’ respective cross motions for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which granted the cross motion of the defendant John L. Homan, and substituting therefor…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Liff v. SchildkroutNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Brustein v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Wittrock v. Maimonides Medical Center-Maimonides HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Daniels v. Zelco, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pinto v. AnconaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Moore v. EwingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Buckley v. National Freight, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Sherry v. North Colonie Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Presbyterian Hospital v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.