Rhodes v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
In this appeal from a conviction of first-degree burglary, 1 and three counts of robbery, 2 appellant contends that the trial court erred (1) by improperly restricting appellant’s right to cross-examine government witnesses, and (2) by refusing to give the requested claim of right instruction to the jury. We conclude that no reversible error was committed, and affirm.
On the afternoon of August 1, 1972, Lamont Tazel was conversing with a neighbor, Earl Byrd, in Tazel’s apartment. During the conversation, Tazel responded to a knock on the front door and was met by…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Springer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Middleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Khaalis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Montgomery v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.