Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sunderland Bros. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1920No. 20853Published

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: Charles Leslie, Judge.

1DissentLetton, J.

The effect of. the majority opinion is to leave the railroad companies free to impose demurrage charges upon the shipper for failing to unload cars seasonably, but to deprive him in many cases of any adequate remedy for the failure of the carriers to perform their duty with respect to the delivery of cars or freight. The act was passed to meet a long-felt defect in the law, and I feel *330satisfied it is not in conflict with, any provision of the Constitution if properly construed.

The constitutionality of reciprocal demurrage statutes has been assailed in a number of states, and they have…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Barnett v. Atlantic & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  3. State v. Indiana & Illinois Southern RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Atchison & Nebraska R. R. v. BatyNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Cram v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1909

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API