In Re Doemling
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERNARD MARKOVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge.
United States National Bank of Johns-town (“USNB”) has objected to debtors’ second amended plan of reorganization, which in essence merely distributes a stated res pursuant to the bankruptcy priorities. USNB asserts that it has a secured rather than an unsecured claim and that it should be treated accordingly in debtors’ plan. It further asserts that the plan can-’ not be confirmed as it violates many of the requirements of the Code such as proper classification of claims and feasibility. According to USNB, it is a secured creditor and not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- MECO REALTY CO. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Nigro v. Oxford Development Co. (In Re M.J. Shoearama, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Prostko v. Rand (In Re Pizazz Disco & Supperclub, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Artisti-kote Co. v. Benefactor Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
3Cited by2 opinions
- Southmark Corp. v. Trotter, Smith & JacobsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- A. Barletta & Sons, Inc. v. Tribble & Stephens Co. (In re A. Barletta & Sons, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995