People v. Richmond
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson
Among the matters to be decided in this predatory criminal sexual assault case is the State’s suggestion that we abandon the requirement that the occurrence of a crime cannot be established solely by a defendant’s uncorroborated confession — the corpus delicti rule.
The issue arises from a jury verdict finding Samuel Richmond guilty of two counts of predatory criminal sexual assault of a six-year-old female, R.J. It has impact on one of the counts, where Richmond received a sentence of 60 years. His sentence on the other count, a consecutive term of 30 years, is not affected by our view of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. PaschIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. SimmsIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. ChapmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. SargentIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. RathboneAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- People v. LaraIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. BuckAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- People v. RojasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.