Legal Opinion

People v. Richmond

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 28, 2003No. 1-01-1656PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

Among the matters to be decided in this predatory criminal sexual assault case is the State’s suggestion that we abandon the requirement that the occurrence of a crime cannot be established solely by a defendant’s uncorroborated confession — the corpus delicti rule.

The issue arises from a jury verdict finding Samuel Richmond guilty of two counts of predatory criminal sexual assault of a six-year-old female, R.J. It has impact on one of the counts, where Richmond received a sentence of 60 years. His sentence on the other count, a consecutive term of 30 years, is not affected by our view of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. PaschIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. SimmsIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. ChapmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. SargentIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. RathboneAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. People v. LaraIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  4. People v. BuckAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. People v. RojasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API