Legal Opinion

Spear v. City of Sterling

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1928No. 28,136PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The question presented here is whether the abutting owner of property is liable for personal injuries suffered by one who falls upon a slippery sidewalk. The action was against the city of Sterling and the owners of the abutting property. A demurrer by the city to the petition was sustained because it failed to show written notice or demand to have been made on the city within three months as required by the statute. (R. S. 12-105.) After the filing of an answer by the owners of the property and a reply by the plaintiff the court sustained…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Rochester v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Jansen v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Dixon v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Atkinson v. Sheriff Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. City of Topeka v. Central Sash & Door Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. JilkaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Moore v. WinnigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Lyon v. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. Harris v. McConnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  5. Clair v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API