Legal Opinion

Clair v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1956No. 40,255PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by reason of a fall on an alleged defective sidewalk in the City of Kansas City, Kansas. Throughout the opinion the parties will be referred to as follows: Betty Lou Clair, the plaintiff and appellee, as plaintiff; the defendants, now the appellants, J. B. Rich, et ah, doing business as the Huron Building, as owners; and the defendant City of Kansas City, Kansas, now appellee, as the city.

Plaintiff commenced the action by the filing of a petition in district court wherein…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jansen v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. Union Street Railway Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  3. City of Topeka v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Smith v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  5. City of Fort Scott v. Penn Lubric Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chambers v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Lyon v. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Harris v. McConnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  4. Chambers v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API