Legal Opinion

State v. Virlee

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 10, 2002No. 02-0046PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.

¶ 1. Shawn Virlee appeals his commitment as a sexually violent person under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 1 and an order denying his motion for post-trial relief. Virlee argues (1) ch. 980 violates due process because it allows commitment without a separate finding of serious difficulty in controlling behavior; (2) the jury instructions misled the jury and violated his due process rights; (3) recent changes to ch. 980 violate equal protection; (4) ch. 980 violates due process and equal protection because it requires pretrial confinement without considering the least restrictive alternative; (5) the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Landis v. Physicians Insurance Co. of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Joseph J. SpaethWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. Joseph J. SpaethWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. Joseph J. SpaethWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API