Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Joseph J. Spaeth

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2014No. 2012AP002170Published

1DissentDavid T. Prosser, J.

¶ 36. {dissenting). The question presented in this case is whether a petition filed pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 980.02 (Chapter 980 petition) for the civil commitment of a sexually violent person must be dismissed when the conviction for the predicate offense has been reversed and the charges dismissed. The majority concludes that when assessing a Chapter 980 petition, a reviewing court may focus on the sufficiency of the petition solely at the time it was filed, Majority op., ¶ 35, enabling the State to prove a different sexually violent offense at the probable cause hearing and at trial, even…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. SpaethWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API