Legal Opinion

Pittman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 5, 2017No. 15-1232Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-1232C Filed: December 5, 2017 **************************************** * Air Force Instruction 36-2605, 36- * 2606, 36-3212; * Military Pay Act,

37 U.S.C. § 204

CHRIS L. PITTMAN, * (2012); * Military Rules of Evidence (“MRE”) Plaintiff, * 103(a)(1); 301(f)(2)–(3); 317; 401; * 403; 404; 615; v. * Rule for Courts-Martial (“RCM”) 915; * Rule of the United States Court of THE UNITED STATES, * Federal Claims (“RCFC”) 52.1(c); * Tucker Act Jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. Defendant, * § 1491 (2012); * Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 * U.S.C. §§ 801–946a…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API