Legal Opinion

People v. Cochran

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1922No. Crim. No. 806PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The appellant was convicted of “practicing mode of treating sick without having valid unrevoked certificate of license from State Board of Medical Examiners.” From the judgment pronounced and an order denying motion for new trial this appeal was taken.

[1] The charging part of the information reads as follows: “That the said A. D. Cochran on or about the 16 day of December, 1920, at, and in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, did willfully, unlawfully and feloniously practice, attempt to practice and advertise and hold himself out as practicing a system and mode of treating the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Ex Parte GreenallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. People v. RatledgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Wong SunMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. SaundersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. People v. RyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API