Legal Opinion

Sorenson v. City National Bank

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1932No. 5889PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge CRITZ

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

The case is before us on certified questions from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Eleventh District at Eastland. The certificate is as follows:

“In the above case Paul B. Sorenson sued J. H. Wallace in Justice Court and at the same time sued out writ of garnishment to City National Bank of Sweetwater. The garnishee in due time answered that it was not indebted to said Wallace and had no effects in its possession belonging to him. Upon a contest of garnishee’s answer Sorenson asserted and tendered as an issue that a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Curtis v. FordTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. W. R. Johnson & Co. v. Blanks, Walker & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Berry Bros. v. Nelson Davis & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Carter Bros. & Co. v. BushTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Willis v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Farm Life Insurance v. SwiftCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. Chandler v. WelbornTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Rosenthal v. Frankfort Distillers Corp. Rosenthal v. Glazer's Wholesale Drug Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  4. Armour Fertilizer Works v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  5. Strickland v. WesterTexas Supreme Court · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API