United States v. Parker
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STAFFORD, District Judge.
The defendant-appellant, Clarence Parker, appeals from the reduced sentence imposed by the district court on the government’s Rule 35(b) motion to reduce sentence based on Parker’s substantial assistance. Parker maintains that the district court failed to take into consideration certain factors that would purportedly warrant an additional downward departure. We DISMISS the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a).
BACKGROUND
The facts are not in dispute. Briefly, Parker was a member of large-scale powder and crack cocaine distribution…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Bernal Chavarria-HerraraCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Joel Rex PridgenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Okwudiri R. Arishi, AKA Remy Arishi, R. ArisiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Austin A. HaskinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Mashica SpannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009