Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Turner

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1911No. 18,412PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Third Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Mary; Charles A. O’Niell, Judge. Action by Virginia Caldwell against Emeline M. Turner. Judgment for plaintiff for insufficient relief, and she appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSommerville, J.

Plaintiff declares upon an oral contract entered into in 1888 with *21Mrs. Amanda Delmas, of St. Mary .parish, La., now deceased. She sues Miss Turner, the residuary or universal legatee of Mrs. Delmas, for $10,200, for value of services rendered Mrs. Delmas under that contract between September 27, 1888, and August 5, 1909, the date of the death of Mrs. Delmas.

The only evidence of this large and important contract is the testimony of plaintiff. The other alleged party to the contract is dead, and there is no testimony of any kind in the record to the effect that the deceased admitted the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bodenheimer v. Executors of BodenheimerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  2. State v. SykesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
  3. Cutler v. Successson of CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885
  4. Succession of DasteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  5. Calhoun v. McKnightSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Haviland v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Groghan v. BillingsleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Succession of BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Succession of OliverSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  5. Terzia v. the Grand LeaderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API