Legal Opinion
United States v. Gerald Caperell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 10, 1991No. 90-10073PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Gerald Caperell appeals his conviction and sentence for engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 848(b)(1) and (b)(2)(A). Caperell presents three arguments on appeal: (1) the indictment failed to state an offense; (2) the government breached the plea agreement; and (3) the sentencing court violated Caperell’s due process rights. We reject these challenges and affirm.
BACKGROUND
Caperell was charged in sixteen counts of a nineteen count superseding indictment. The charges related to Caperell’s involvement in the manufacture, distribution and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gary Lamere v. Henry Risley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Jim Skinner Ford, Inc. v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. John MoscahlaidisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Walter Dale BroncheauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- United States v. Abdul Daas, A/K/A Abdual DaasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Michael J. PeterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Nicholas Panarella, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. James A. BohnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Carlos CortezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.