Legal Opinion

Seelbinder v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 10, 1935No. 4-3896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, C. J.

This litigation arises out of the following facts and circumstances. On October 31, 1925, appellant, Hugo Seelbinder, purchased from one S. P. Shaddock an abstract business and plant commonly known in that vicinity as the Security Abstract Company located at Van Burén, Arkansas, and paid or agreed to pay $2,000 as consideration therefor. This money was borrowed by appellant from the First National Bank of Van Burén. W. A. Steel, now deceased, was president of this bank when the note was executed and at all times subsequently referred to in this opinion. Soon after appellant's purchase he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Petty v. GackingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Richardson v. Merchants' & Planters' Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The W. T. Rawleigh Company v. BerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API