The W. T. Rawleigh Company v. Berry
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
In 1931, W. W. Haimes entered into a written contract with appellant to purchase certain goods, wares and merchandise. As a condition upon which sales of the goods would he made, Haimes was required to furnish sureties that the goods would he paid for. W. C. Berry, Jr., and R. B. McKnight signed the contract as sureties. A similar contract was made .and signed by Berry and McKnight as sureties covering sales made in the year 1932. Haimes was indebted to appellant in the sum of $994.63. The sureties were called upon for payment when Haimes failed to pay. Correspondence between one of .these…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fullerton v. StorthzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- National Surety Co. v. Bertig Bros.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Johnson v. AnkrumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Randle v. Overland Texarkana CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Richardson v. Merchants' & Planters' Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.