Legal Opinion

Etherington v. Hardee

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided April 27, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 12704PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INGRAHAM, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity for patent infringement in which a preliminary and final injunction, accounting, and assessment of treble damages and costs are sought. The case is before the court upon defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for failure to join an indispensable party. The crux of defendants’ motion is that titleholder of the patent, Hughes Tool Company, is no longer a party plaintiff and that this action is maintained only by an exclusive licensee in a specific field of the patent’s application. ,

It is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Pope Manufacturing Co. v. Gormully & Jeffery Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walter H. Etherington v. S. M. Hardee, D/B/A Hardee Tool CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  2. Walter H. Etherington v. S. M. Hardee, D/B/A Hardee Tool CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API