Pallas v. Dailey

We originally dismissed this appeal because of lack of jurisdiction. See Pallas v. Dailey, ante p. 277, 99 N. W. 2d 6. Since that time, for good cause shown, we permitted a supplemental transcript to be filed. See Rule 4 c, Revised Rules of the Supreme Court, 1959. An order nunc pro tunc, entered by the trial court on November 19, 1959, and contained in the supplemental transcript, shows the original decree of the trial court was actually rendered on January 29, 1959, rather than on November 14, 1958, as disclosed by the original transcript filed herein on May 2, 1959. In view of that fact…