Legal Opinion
E. H. Patterson v. C.I.T. Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 6, 1965No. 7944_1PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the District Court erred in entering a default judgment against the defendant Patterson for $204,579.52, because of the failure to respond to a notice of taking his deposition, pursuant to a notice served only upon his attorney of record. 1 We agree with Patterson’s contention that the record does not disclose that Patterson’s failure to appear at the time and place designated in the notice for the taking of his deposition was willful.
The plaintiff, C. I. T. Corporation, sought to recover from Patterson the sum of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Robert J. Gill v. Julius Stolow and Harry Stolow, Copartners, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of J. & H. StolowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- United States of America for the Use of Weston & Brooker Company, a Corporation v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Brookdale Mill, Inc., and Lehigh River Mill, Inc. v. Warren J. Rowley and John P. ReadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
3Cited by28 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,803 Steven Flaks v. David I. Koegel and Flora Mir Candy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Lee v. Max Intern., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Gocolay v. New Mexico Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Gates Rubber Co. v. Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 1996
- Klein-Becker USA, LLC v. EnglertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.