Legal Opinion

Brookdale Mill, Inc., and Lehigh River Mill, Inc. v. Warren J. Rowley and John P. Read

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 15, 1954No. 12151_1PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

This case came on to be heard on the record and briefs and oral argument of ■counsel;

And it appearing that the appellees on August 10, 1953, in actions instituted by appellants, Pennsylvania corporations, in the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, and consolidated in the District Court for purposes of appeal, filed certain interrogatories under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to which appellants made no objection and filed no answers;

And it appearing that the answers to said interrogatories were due August 25, 1953, and that on September 10, 1953, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re PierceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. New Union Coal Company v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Roberts, Johnson & Rand Shoe Co. v. DowerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
  4. Donk Bros. Coal & Coke Co. v. PetonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Ann Bass v. Jostens, Inc., and James Dredge, Jostens Learning CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  3. W. Lamonte Robison, Trustee of Beehive Security Thrift & Loan v. Transamerica Insurance Co., and Firemans Fund Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  4. Gonzales v. Surgidev Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. United States of America for the Use of Weston & Brooker Company, a Corporation v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API