Montgomery v. Richards Building Materials, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pannell, Judge.
1. The provisions of Code § 67-2002 that to make good a lien the materialman must commence "an action for the recovery of his claim within twelve months from the time the same shall be due” relates to the action against the contractor rather than an action against the owner to enforce the lien. Buck v. Tifton Mfg. Co., 4 Ga. App. 695, 696 (62 SE 107). This ruling, however, does not so control the meaning of similar language in the Act of 1953 (Ga. L. 1953, p. 544, Code Ann. § 67-2004), providing for the discharge of a materialman’s lien upon the filing of a bond "conditioned to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mauck v. RosserSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Royal v. McPhailSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Buck v. Tifton Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- The Jordan Company v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
3Cited by4 opinions
- M. Shapiro & Sons, Inc. v. Yates Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Time Financial Services, Inc. v. HewittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- M. Shapiro & Sons, Inc. v. Yates Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- M. Shapiro & Sons, Inc. v. Yates Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976