Legal Opinion

City of Helena v. Danichek

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1996No. 95-394PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erdmann

Appellant Frank Danichek appeals from an order entered by the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, denying his motion to dismiss the charge of driving under the influence of alcohol on double jeopardy grounds. We affirm.

The issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred in denying Danichek’s motion to dismiss based on his claim that the Double Jeopardy Clause of both the United States and Montana Constitutions prohibits him from being criminally prosecuted for operating a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol following the suspension of his driver’s license for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. State v. RushtonMontana Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. WeaverMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. BranderMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. GoebelMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. NicholsMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. SolMontana Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API