Legal Opinion

People v. Nash

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1968No. Crim. 3373PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAY, J. *

Defendant appeals from judgment after jury verdict finding defendant guilty of the offense of forcible rape and from the order denying new trial.

Questions Presented

1. No error in mentioning name of assailant in testimony of fresh complaint.

2. Defendant’s adoptive admissions were properly admitted. (Escobedo-Dor ado not applicable.)

3. No error in refusal to give certain instructions.

4. Verdict well supported by the evidence.

5. Police were entitled to enter defendant’s apartment.

6. No error in bringing out defendant’s prior record.

Record

On April 19, 1962, defendant was convicted by a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. People v. CockrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. MayberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. CiceroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. People v. FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API