Legal Opinion
Firelands Sewer & Water Construction Co. v. Rochester Pure Waters District
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 19, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons stated at Special Term (Livingston, J.). (See Matter of Ballard Constr. v Ross, 63 AD2d 99; Matter of Expert Elec, v Goldin, 51 AD2d 763.) We reject respondents-appellants’ argument that chapter 336 of the Laws of 1978, amending section 220 of the Labor Law, should be applied retroactively. Any suggestion that the Legislature intended that the amend*814ment be so applied is negated by section 4 of chapter 336 which states that the amendment "shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall have become a law.”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Deutsch v. CatherwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Ayman v. Teachers' Retirement BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Ballard Construction Inc. v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Expert Electric, Inc. v. GoldinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3Cited by4 opinions
- De Lia Construction Corp. v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Eastern Rock Products, Inc. v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Ring v. LangdonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Schultz Construction, Inc. v. RossNew York Supreme Court · 1979