Deutsch v. Catherwood
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGabrielli, J.
In November, 1965, respondents entered into a contract with the State to perform certain electrical work at the State armory in Manhattan. The contract, as well as the *489required specifications promulgated by the State, provided that there were to be two classes of workmen, described as “ electrician ” and “electrician-apprentice-lst term”. "When the work commenced in February, 1966, petitioners hired certain employees to assist and be under the direction of two “ electricians ”. These new employees, denominated apprentices by respondents, were paid at a rate less than that provided for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Carder Realty Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Evadan Realty Corp. v. PattersonNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- Carder Realty Corporation v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
3Cited by52 opinions
- People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Becker v. Huss Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. UtseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Morales v. WalterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Sessa v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.