Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1926No. 20155. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

This is a personal injury ease. The city of Seattle operates a double track street railway between West Seattle and the city proper. For the most part, the tracks are elevated, but in the neighborhood of Lander street, they are laid on the ground. At or near this street, the city has provided platforms from which passengers may alight from the outgoing cars or get aboard the ingoing cars. The outgoing platform is immediately west of and adjoining the outbound track, and the other platform is immediately east of and adjoining the ingoing track. Persons desiring to take an inbound car must…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Leftridge v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hynek v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hohman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Switzer v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Fredericks v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Larson v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API