Legal Opinion

Scheu v. Newsham

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1963No. 10007Published

1Opinion of the Court

BOLIN, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action ex delicto-individually and as administrator of the estate of his minor son to recover damages for injuries resulting to the latter while playing or riding on the arm of' an oil well pump owned and operated by defendant Newsham in the City of Springhill, Louisiana. Made co-defendant was Newsham’s insurer. From judgment sustaining an exception of no- cause of *761■action filed by defendant, plaintiff has •appealed.

It is evident from plaintiff’s petition the cause of action is predicated on the attractive nuisance doctrine. Without setting forth in detail…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Plauche v. Consolidated CompaniesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  2. Danna v. London Guarantee & Accident CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Buchanan v. C. R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Friedman's Estate v. Texas & Pac. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  5. O'BIER v. Manufacturers Cas. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API