Legal Opinion

Friedman's Estate v. Texas & Pac. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 7, 1945No. 37502PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Justice.

Plaintiff, a copartnership composed of the heirs of Mrs. C. Friedman, seeks to recover m this suit the sum of $520, the value of its five brood mares and one colt which were struck and killed by defendant’s fast passenger train during a run between Fort Worth, Texas, and New Orleans, Louisiana.

Judgment in plaintiff’s favor for the named amount was rendered by the district court. On appeal to the Court of Appeal, it was set aside and the suit dismissed. 24 So.2d 167. The cause is before us on a writ of review or certiorari.

As is pointed out in the briefs of counsel, the facts…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tomlinson v. VicksburgSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  2. Peters v. PearceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  3. Sanders v. Illinois Cent. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  4. Buchanan v. C. R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Fincher v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Saxton v. Plum Orchards, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Moody v. Texas P. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. O'BIER v. Manufacturers Cas. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Wood v. State Department of HighwaysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Bush v. Texas & Pacific RailroadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API