Daniels v. Daniels
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
J. FREDERICK SHARER (Retired, Specially Assigned), J.
It is established that, in order to effectively convey title to real property, the title documents—ordinarily a deed—must be delivered by the grantor to the grantee. An exception to the requirement of actual delivery is found in the doctrine of constructive delivery.
In the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, the court ruled that the conduct of James H. Daniels, which we shall detail, infra, did not satisfy the requirements of either actual or constructive delivery of a deed by Daniels to his wife, appellant, Lana Daniels. Hence, the court,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Younge v. GuilbeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Young v. CockmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Clark v. CreswellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- Renehan v. McAvoyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Rogers v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.