Legal Opinion

Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. McAuliffe

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided December 2, 2015No. Case No.: 4:15-cv-00031PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jackson L. Kiser, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On November 6, 2015,1 heard argument on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) Motions to Dismiss. The parties have fully briefed the motions, and I have reviewed the relevant filings and arguments of counsel. For the reasons stated herein, I will grant Defendants’ motions and, accordingly, deny Plaintiffs’ motion as moot.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1

Located just to the northeast of Chat-ham, Virginia, the Coles Hill .estate’s gently sloped fields have…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. John WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  3. Reid v. James Madison UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2024
  4. Stanley v. BocockDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2024
  5. Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. John WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API