Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Verban v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1942Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBelt, J.

I am unable to concur in all that has been said in the majority opinion concerning the mat ter of procedure, but I do think the conclusion reached therein — that the circuit court had jurisdiction of the cause — is correct.

I dissent from that part of the opinion holding that the circuit court has no authority to direct payment of attorneys’ fees in a lump sum.

Defendant commission contends that the circuit court had no authority to award attorneys’ fees in the sum of $192.50, payable in a lump sum. Plaintiff had a contract with his attorneys that, in the event he recovered more compensation on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cox v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Wims v. Hercules Contracting Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Carr v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API