Legal Opinion

Carr v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

On July 5, 1934, William A. Carr, while working in Portland, was injured in the course of his employment. He and his employer were under the provisions of the Workman’s Compensation Act. He applied to the Industrial Accident Commission, and was awarded compensation at the rate of permánent partial disability equal to 25 per cent of loss of the function of his leg. Thereafter, the commission made its final order fixing the injured workman’s compensation as for temporary total disability for a period of 14 months, and further found that the injured workman sustained a permanent partial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hyman Bros. Box & Label Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. M. T. Smith & Son Drilling Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Casaday v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Interstate Window Glass Co. v. KitchensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cox v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Verban v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Dickison v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Cox v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Verban v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API